AIAny
Icon for item

Beyond Teacher Assignment: Domain-Normalized Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

Normalizes each domain's teacher feedback spread during multi-teacher on-policy distillation so that no domain (e.g., instruction following) overwhelms others, improving student recovery of specialist skills and raising average scores across benchmarks.

Introduction

Most multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MOPD) work focuses on which specialist teaches each prompt, but neglects how strongly each specialist's token-level feedback should move the shared student. This paper shows that unequal feedback spread across domains (instruction-following feedback being much more diffuse than mathematics feedback) skews the optimization budget and prevents the student from inheriting some specialist gains. The core insight: deciding who teaches is insufficient—you must also decide how strongly each teacher's feedback counts.

Key Findings
  • Measuring each domain's empirical feedback spread and rescaling teacher supervision by that spread (Domain-Normalized MOPD, DN-MOPD) reduces dominance from diffuse domains and restores balance across specialties.
  • Across three model sizes (Qwen3.5 variants), six public benchmarks, three random seeds and two answer-length limits, DN-MOPD improves average performance over standard MOPD and recovers most of the mathematics specialist's lost advantage.
  • Ablations with fixed domain weights indicate the primary benefit comes from attenuating instruction-following feedback rather than simply amplifying mathematics feedback; fixed weights close to DN-MOPD's measured scales perform similarly.
Method overview
  • At each token, compute a per-domain measure of feedback spread (how widely the teacher's corrections are distributed) and use it to normalize that domain's contribution to the student's gradient updates.
  • The approach keeps standard routing (which teacher is selected) but rescales the magnitude of the supervision so token-share and optimization budget are balanced across domains.
Who it's for and tradeoffs

Great fit if you train a single consolidated LLM from multiple RL-tuned specialists and observe capability imbalances (e.g., instruction-following dominating math). DN-MOPD is a low-friction, label-free adjustment to existing MOPD pipelines that preserves routing choices while rebalancing learning signals. Look elsewhere if imbalance stems from mislabeled data, fundamentally incompatible model capacity, or when per-domain sequence-length and convergence differences are already corrected by other scheduling mechanisms; DN-MOPD addresses feedback-scale imbalance specifically rather than all multi-domain training pathologies.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsXin Li, Hao Jiang, Xin Gao, Annan Wang, Yuchen Xie, Jinghao Guo, Xingwei Qu, Yichi Zhang, Chau Yuen
  • Published date2026/09/28

More Items

Trains an 8B model to search, synthesize evidence, and write cited research reports. Its reinforcement-learning rewards use evolving rubrics grounded in retrieved evidence and contrasting model responses.

Trains long-horizon web researchers by combining agentic mid-training, synthetic trajectories, and reinforcement learning. A 30.5B-parameter model activates 3.3B parameters per token and learns to plan, search, and synthesize evidence.

Explains how base-model behavior and GRPO normalization distort claims about reasoning gains. Introduces Dr. GRPO to reduce length bias, with a 7B training recipe reaching 43.3% on AIME 2024.