AIAny
Icon for item

MobileMem: Learning from a Year of Mobile Experiences

Provides a year-scale multimodal benchmark and evaluation framework for on-device long-term memory in personal assistants, built from real mobile user trajectories. Tests memory construction, retrieval, updating, temporal reasoning, and implicit preference inference, and includes a knowledge-grounded synthesis pipeline to form coherent long-horizon trajectories.

Introduction

Realistic personal assistants must remember and adapt to a user's evolving experiences over months, but most memory benchmarks reduce personalization to short dialogs or isolated facts. MobileMem flips that assumption: it treats a year of mobile usage as the unit of experience, asking memory systems to aggregate fragmented signals across apps, modalities, and time so agents can answer long-horizon questions and update beliefs as users change.

Key Findings
  • Benchmark design: MobileMem supplies year-scale user trajectories in both text and multimodal (omni) splits, pairing chronologically ordered app events, conversations, and screenshots with long-horizon QA that require multi-hop retrieval and temporal integration. This emphasizes experience-level memory rather than single-shot retrieval.
  • Synthesis & realism: A knowledge-grounded experience synthesis pipeline (used to produce coherent lifelong trajectories from fragmented sessions) enables temporally consistent scenarios where attributes, habits, and preferences must be inferred from distributed traces across apps.
  • Evaluation protocol: Systems process sessions in chronological order, incrementally build or update memory, and answer retained questions from the final memory state—making failures traceable to what the memory retrieved vs. model reasoning.
  • Research implications: Experiments reveal gaps in current memory systems, especially in updating changing preferences and aggregating sparse cross-app evidence, highlighting memory design as the primary bottleneck for long-horizon personalization.
Who it's for and tradeoffs

Great fit if you research or build personalized assistants, retrieval/memory architectures for agents, or multimodal long-horizon benchmarks and need realistic mobile behavior traces and targeted probes (e.g., temporal QA, implicit preference inference). Look elsewhere if you need purely conversational benchmarks, very large-scale public user logs (privacy constraints limit raw real-world data release), or turnkey memory systems—the contribution is a benchmark and synthesis framework, not a drop-in production memory service.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsXinle Deng, Yida Xue, Xiangyuan Ru, Haoming Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Mengru Wang, Yijun Chen, Buqiang Xu, Chen Jiang, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang
  • Published date2026/08/11

More Items

Turns each research paper into a training environment to generate verifiable research plans by synthesizing questions from goals/background and deriving evaluation criteria from methods/experiments. Key features: four-stage extraction that reduces criterion leakage to 3.7%, a two-stage rubric-centered training (self-distillation then GRPO), and the PaperGym-20k corpus with two held-out benchmarks.

Hugging Face

Provides manually curated Japanese instruction pairs (questions and safe reference answers) for improving LLM output safety, covering broad harm categories and regionally sensitive cases. Includes English meta-tags and standard splits for benchmarking and fine-tuning.

Trains LLM agents to proactively edit and manage their working context for long-horizon tasks using an expanded toolset (planning, long-term memory, soft offloading) and a fine-grained RL algorithm that identifies critical edits and assigns action-level credit. Improves accuracy while keeping contexts compact on long-context QA and deep search.