AIAny
Icon for item

NeoHorse-1: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement via Agentic Post-Training with Routing Harness

Explores a practical mechanism for recursive self-improvement by post-training LLMs: uses a routing harness to record agent executions and convert traces into curriculum-guided supervised fine-tuning and on-policy distillation data, closing an evaluation-selection-update loop and improving benchmark performance.

Introduction

Most model improvement pipelines treat user interactions as isolated examples. NeoHorse-1 reframes agent executions as structured curriculum signal: by recording routing decisions, tool calls, and outcomes, it converts real harnessed agent trajectories into validated training examples and then reintroduces updated models into the same harness to close a feedback loop.

Key Findings
  • Routing-guided curriculum and on-policy distillation: routing signals organize supervised fine-tuning into a three-stage curriculum and supervise student responses under the same progression, preserving interleaved reasoning and tool context.
  • Evaluation-selection-update loop: capability-guided allocation turns evaluation feedback into the next training mixture, creating a prototype closed loop for iterative improvement (a step toward recursive self-improvement).
  • Empirical gains: post-training raises the ten-benchmark macro-average from 58.94 to 64.87 for the 4B model and from 65.60 to 69.04 for the 9B model, narrowing the gap between model sizes across agent, coding, and instruction-following tasks.
  • Data & quality controls: heterogeneous model pool routing, structural validation, six-dimensional semantic evaluation, subscene-level labeling, and decontamination to preserve execution context while reducing noise.
Who it's for and trade-offs

Great fit if you run an agent harness or multi-model routing infrastructure and want to turn real executions and tool use into training signal without losing execution context. Look elsewhere if you need plug-and-play performance gains without building routing/evaluation pipelines: the approach requires investment in routing instrumentation, evaluation labeling, and curriculum design, and the paper presents an initial prototype rather than a turnkey solution.

Methodology overview

The system pairs a heterogeneous model pool with intelligent routing that records predicted capability demand and chosen service tier per turn. These traces are validated, semantically evaluated, labeled at subscene granularity (Scene/Goal/Outcome), and mixed into routing-guided SFT and on-policy distillation schedules; updated models can re-enter the harness to form repeated evaluation-selection-update iterations.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsGuoliang Cao, Guohao Dai, Tianyu Guo, Kai Han, Hailin Hu, Zihan Jiang, Xiang Kuang, Boxun Li, Yulong Li, Zehua Pei
  • Published date2026/09/08

More Items

Defines the Discovery Certification Protocol (DCP) to audit claims of discovery by AI research agents, converting claims into executable recovery and feedback tests. Specifies multi-gate certification, Core control requirements, and a deterministic offline verifier; validated in two controlled audits.

Evaluates whether AI agents can autonomously use Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to discover interpretable features and causally steer model behavior. Introduces a 20-task benchmark that has agents design contrastive probes to search a 131K+ feature dictionary in Gemma-2-9B-IT and evaluates activation rank, selectivity, and causal steering against expert references.

Provides a diagnostic benchmark of 4,084 multiple-choice questions derived from longitudinal wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics of 200 users to evaluate LLM reasoning on real-world wearable data. Uses 16 question types across complementary axes and a dual-grounding framework combining literature findings with population statistics.