AIAny
Icon for item

SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?

Evaluates whether coding agents can modify real scientific software while preserving domain-specific scientific contracts. Contains 119 repository-level tasks across 98 GitHub projects and 20 scientific domains, measures reproducible edits in pinned Docker images, and analyzes recurring failure modes.

Introduction

Scientific software encodes domain knowledge and data semantics that make simple patch-based evaluation misleading: a passing unit test can still break scientific contracts. SWE-bench Science surfaces this gap by forcing coding agents to edit real repositories while preserving units, file formats, numerical invariants, and end-to-end behavior.

Key Findings
  • Benchmark scope and setup: 119 tasks drawn from 98 GitHub repositories spanning 20 scientific domains, organized into three paradigms (Issue-driven, Expert-exploratory, Engineering-integration). Each task ships a baseline environment image and a separate verifier image; images are immutable and pinned by digest for reproducible evaluation.
  • Performance and difficulty: Even the best agent evaluated (Claude Code with Opus-5 (max)) achieves pass@1 below 50%, showing that repository-level scientific repairs remain challenging for current coding agents.
  • Failure mechanisms: Four recurring modes are identified — lack of scientific abstraction/knowledge, surface-level or misguided exploration, incomplete system-level integration or coverage, and failures to generalize scientific reasoning beyond observed examples.
  • Ablation insight: Removing explicit scientific guidance (while preserving repository and execution context) yields mixed effects — accurate, well-aligned scientific guidance can constrain search and improve efficiency, but misaligned guidance can anchor agents and hurt exact-repair success.
Who it's for and tradeoffs

Great fit if you research coding-agent capabilities, evaluate LLM-driven code repair in domain-rich settings, or need a repository-level benchmark that stresses scientific correctness beyond unit tests. Look elsewhere if you need micro-level function-completion tasks or synthetic toy benchmarks; SWE-bench Science emphasizes end-to-end engineering context, reproducible images, and held-out verifiers rather than isolated function synthesis. The benchmark favors experiments that integrate execution, pinned environments (Docker images), and domain-aware verification over purely prompt-based code generation.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsZhipeng Xu, Jiahao Lu, Yining Zheng, Yuxin Wang, Xipeng Qiu
  • Published date2026/08/20

Categories

More Items

Autonomous multimodal GUI agent that executes natural-language interface tasks across mobile apps, web domains, and desktop OS. Expands environment coverage (170+ multilingual apps, 4,000+ web domains), uses function-grounded task generation and keypoint-based multi-model verification to produce reliable RL rewards for real-world deployment.

Turns each research paper into a training environment to generate verifiable research plans by synthesizing questions from goals/background and deriving evaluation criteria from methods/experiments. Key features: four-stage extraction that reduces criterion leakage to 3.7%, a two-stage rubric-centered training (self-distillation then GRPO), and the PaperGym-20k corpus with two held-out benchmarks.

Trains LLM agents to proactively edit and manage their working context for long-horizon tasks using an expanded toolset (planning, long-term memory, soft offloading) and a fine-grained RL algorithm that identifies critical edits and assigns action-level credit. Improves accuracy while keeping contexts compact on long-context QA and deep search.