AIAny

XGrammar: Flexible and Efficient Structured Generation Engine for Large Language Models

Enforces output grammars during LLM decoding while reducing CPU validation overhead. Precomputed token masks and persistent stacks support nested formats without checking the full vocabulary at every step.

Introduction

A fast model can still spend time waiting for CPU-side grammar checks. The useful insight is that most token-validity decisions depend only on a local grammar state, so they can be cached before generation rather than recomputed for every token.

Key Findings
  • Separating cacheable checks from stack-dependent checks preserves recursive grammar support while reducing runtime work.
  • Context expansion and persistent stacks handle the remaining cases and enable efficient branching and rollback.
  • The authors report up to 100× faster mask generation than existing methods in their evaluation. Overlapping grammar work with GPU execution makes structured output overhead nearly disappear in tested serving configurations; this is not a universal application speedup.
Who Should Read It

Useful for inference engineers serving tool calls, nested JSON, or domain-specific output languages. It explains where format enforcement belongs in a serving pipeline. Grammar compliance does not establish that an answer is factually correct or that a proposed tool action is appropriate; those need separate checks.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • OrganizationsCarnegie Mellon University, NVIDIA, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, University of California, Berkeley
  • AuthorsYixin Dong, Charlie F. Ruan, Yaxing Cai, Ruihang Lai, Ziyi Xu, Yilong Zhao, Tianqi Chen
  • Published date2024/11/22

More Items

Lets language models move information between their context window and external storage. Memory editing, retrieval, and function chaining support conversations and document analysis beyond a single prompt's capacity.

Lets language-model agents compose tools through executable Python and revise actions from interpreter feedback. Evaluates 17 models and releases 7,000 interaction trajectories for training agents that can debug their own code.

Explains when language models benefit from external programs, comparing tool selection, use, and creation. Evaluates performance gains against compute costs and identifies gaps in tool-use benchmarks.